Talk:Ritz-Carlton

Latest comment: 11 years ago by SaraLueders in topic Locations

Copyvio

edit

This page seems like advertising to me. "Every guest that passes through our doors"? I suspect some Ritz-Carlton executive copy-pasted an advertising pamphlet into this article. MrHumperdink 23:02, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

And I will thus mark it as such. Cursive 23:12, 27 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. This is the worst article I've read on Wikipedia. Not only is it advertising, it's tedious and self-important, and (in places) the English is woeful. I tidied up a few sentences, but don't know why I bothered.

The only thing of interest would be to know whether Ritz-Carlton is connected to The Ritz in Paris or London. I guess it's safe to assume that the chain's name is just a knock-off. If there were a connection, I'm sure the RC advertising department would have told us all about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.229.122 (talk) 19:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Use of the Ritz name

edit

The article doesn't explain how this company came to use the same name as the famous (and older) hotels in London and Paris. Olborne 17:47, 1 July 2006 (UTC) I agree.. Ritz-carlton idiots are busy polishing the brass on their hotel entrances, forgetting about the real story.. I worked for that company for many years in executive level, it is not what everybody thinks.. Sadly, they do not treat their employees very well —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.196.76.40 (talk) 07:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Locations

edit

Why are only some locations listed in the article ? And why are the 50+ North American locations not mentioned. The partial list should be completely removed. UrbanNerd (talk) 00:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I completely agree with this edit. A long list of commercial properties, even if it were complete, was not encyclopedic. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 14:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think that this article should go more into detail about the different locations that the Rtiz has to offer. SaraLueders (talk) 18:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply