Talk:River Loxley

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:River Loxley map.

Sheffield Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sheffield on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SheffieldWikipedia:WikiProject SheffieldTemplate:WikiProject SheffieldSheffield articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal River Loxley is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK Waterways Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article should be merged with Loxley, South Yorkshire as it is currently only a two and a half line stub.

That it is a stub does not mean it should be merged—it means that it should be expanded. —JeremyA 14:35, 11 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes but I doubt it can be expanded any more than it currently has been. -andrewpking 16:01, 11 November 2006

The Sheffield Project has many scopes over which its interests leads it to edit. The article will get edited in the future. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 17:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Loxley/Rivelin

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've reversed the reference to the Loxley flowing into the Rivelin because Ordnance Survey maps name the course of the combined rivers below their confluence as "River Loxley" (see OS pathfinder map SK 28/38)--Mabzilla (talk) 14:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC).Reply

Tributaries and Reservoirs

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"The upper river is marked by the presence of four large reservoirs, used for the impounding of drinking water", so the article says, but one dam, Dam Fask is a compensation reservoir rather than one used for drinking water, and the other dams are on the Dale Dike, Strines Dike and Aden Dike, not the Loxley. Does this part of the article need changing?2A00:23C4:D891:1100:1D77:E6E3:F739:BFF4 (talk) 04:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic