Talk:Riverdale High School (Quebec)

As I said in the edit summary, high schools are notable. I'd say adding a prod tag to it may be better in order to get people familiar with school articles involved. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 02:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't see how giving this one-liner another five days (it's had two weeks) is going to turn it into a worthwhile article, but I guess we'll see. android79 02:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
I honestly think it's just that no one knows it's here. I'm sure a lot of people involved w/the schools stuff are watching prod, so... --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 02:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Who is Mike Calce? Did he really go to Riverdale (Ive googled him, and I got something like this. But no Riverdale)? I go there, and I've never heard of him.

Fair use rationale for Image:RiverdaleHighSchoolLogo.jpg

edit
 

Image:RiverdaleHighSchoolLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply