Talk:Roads and freeways in metropolitan Phoenix/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Kurumi and AARoads I do not believe are reliable sources, ref 18-21 are the exact same link, use named references to avoid duplication.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Suggest asking the Maps Task Force for a map for the article, maybe a few more images, because just having US 60 with an image seems odd

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

--Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Failing GA after 6 days of no improvements. --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 15:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)