Talk:Rob Grant

Fair use rationale for Image:Colony (2000 Rob Grant book) cover.jpg

Image:Colony (2000 Rob Grant book) cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Primordial Soup and Son Of Soup

I'm curious as to why there is reference to Son Of Soup which implies that this is a novel co-written with Doug Naylor, rather than the collection of Red Dwarf scripts that it really is. Equally puzzling is that there's no mention of Primordial Soup - the Red Dwarf script collection to which Son Of Soup is the sequel. I think there needs to be some discussion on how to deal with these two books as consistency appears to be lacking.

Ronstar308 (talk) 03:01, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Quanderhorn Xperimentations Needs to be More Conspicuous

This article does not mention that Rob Grant co-wrote "The Quanderhorn Xperimentations" until the "Bibliography" section. Would it be possible to move this nearer to the beginning of the article? Vorbee (talk) 17:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)