Talk:Robbie the Reindeer
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Adpete in topic 3rd episode CGI not claymation?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robbie the Reindeer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
edit"It's because they couldn't use Rudolph's name at all, not even to mention that Robbie was his son."
- But why? Hopefully Rudolph isn't still under some kind of copyright. Was it a fictional plot element that prevented Rudolph's name from being spoken? The article lacks sufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. CanadianCaesar 23:01, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
I agree, I was wondering the same thing. Someone who knows more about this subject needs to clear this up and add to the article.
--Merond e 12:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's quite likely that Rudolph is still copyright, having been created after 1923. The stifling of Rudolph's name is implied as a joke that it wasn't possible to get copyright permission, but not explicitly stated (as this would break the fourth wall.AlmostReadytoFly 19:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Shortening
editI don't think the entire plot needs to be given in detail, and will summarise. AlmostReadytoFly 23:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
3rd episode CGI not claymation?
editI'm pretty sure the 3rd episode was CGI, not claymation. Hopefully someone can find a ref for this. Adpete (talk) 04:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)