Talk:Robbins Airport (Illinois)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SilverLocust in topic Requested move 10 July 2023
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 10 July 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 12:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
– Should be primary topic since Robbins Airport in Massachusetts has been determined to be not notable enough for a standalone article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbins Airport. Hirolovesswords (talk) 13:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- I have added a disposition for Robbins Airport to comply with WP:EXPLICIT because the proposer has changed that page from a redirect to a disambiguation as suggested by IP 67. SilverLocust 💬 20:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment the Massachusetts airport navbox needs to be updated if this is moved. The current Robbins Airport should be converted to being a redirect called Robbins Airport, Danvers, Massachusetts or Robbins Airport (Danvers, Massachusetts) -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 23:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose moving Illinois. Instead "Robbins Airport" should become a disambiguation page. There also being Robbins Airport (Wyoming), Robbins Field, Thompson–Robbins Airport -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 23:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Aviation has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject United States has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not seeing a primary topic here; creation of a disambiguation page by the nom as suggested by the IP is the correct outcome IMO. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- Leaning oppose per those above. BD2412 T 23:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.