Talk:Robert Brasillach

[Untitled]

I'm not sure what the judge's reference to his "approving of Germany penetrating France" has to do with Brasillach's homosexuality. France is female in French ("la France"). 79.180.252.240 (talk) 12:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

It would be great if Brasillach's literary oeuvre could be expanded upon here. Ditto his activities with Je suis partout.99.240.142.65 (talk) 04:30, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

FYI - It is a little cheeky to ask me to provide citations for the latest edit considering that there are no cites for anything in this entire article. Read Kaplan, a source quoted as a reference before my edit and a very balanced source, and critical of the author, I might add. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.142.65 (talk) 04:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

When adding quotations, especially offensive ones, you really need to provide in-line citations. See WP:CS. --Odie5533 (talk) 04:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

By offensive, I assume you are refering to the cupboard comment Brasillach made in his diary. If anything, that makes him appear callous, cold-hearted and completely divorced from the terrible plight he helped inflict on French jewry. I don't know how the comment could be interpretted in any other light. However, after reading the way I originally cast his last words "wit, sang froid and a lack of repentence" (or something like that), I realized that this was total POV and deleted this myself - I think calling out "Long Live France Anyway" when being shot by Frenchmen for crimes against France was witty and evidence of sang froid and that, like many distasteful people (Saddam being a recent example), he "died well" - but expressing that feeling (certainly it wasn't a fact!), is, I understand, inappropriate in a Wiki article. 99.240.142.65 (talk) 21:34, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't suppose many people have read the contents of some of the links included in this article, but it appears that some of the text in the anonymous "Radbod" article is the same (sometimes verbatim) as the text of the Fulford article published in the Canadian newspaper, the National Post. 99.240.142.65 (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I think this page now has sufficient inline citations to merit the removal of the tag at the top of the page, no? It has more citations than many wiki articles, including for all major points and themes. 99.240.139.189 (talk) 04:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

I know that the notion of Brasillach being executed only for "hate speech" is from Salon.com, its still false, so I took it out. Brasillach was mainly executed because he published the names of Jews and other "Enemys of State" in his magazine and called for their murder.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Robert Brasillach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090725135125/http://archive.salon.com/books/it/2000/03/29/kaplan/index.html to http://archive.salon.com/books/it/2000/03/29/kaplan/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040824033326/http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/alumni/dm29/words.html to http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/alumni/dm29/words.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)