Talk:Robert Gillmor

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Robert Gillmor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120405141135/http://www.henleystandard.co.uk/entertainment/ent.php?id=988675 to http://www.henleystandard.co.uk/entertainment/ent.php?id=988675
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402195200/http://www.birdwatch.co.uk/channel/newsitem.asp?c=11&cate=__7806 to http://www.birdwatch.co.uk/channel/newsitem.asp?c=11&cate=__7806
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111022172111/http://www.readingmuseum.org.uk/events/details/229/ to http://www.readingmuseum.org.uk/events/details/229/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Image caption

I'm getting rather tired of having to restore relevant and informative content to the image caption, not least when the guidelines quoted in edit summaries removing it are being wildly misapplied. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Andy, per MOS:CAPLENGTH a full-sentence caption is appropriate when the "caption […] convey[s] the significance of the article by explaining the significance or context of the image". Please explain how your proposed caption does that? Neither Gillmor's "week as artist in residence at Nature in Art" nor his work "Birds New to Norfolk" is even mentioned anywhere in the article so they obviously can't be of the significance you ascribe to them. Robby.is.on (talk) 18:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

As you yourself quote: "a full-sentence caption is appropriate when ... explaining the significance or context of the image". Also, "Birds New to Norfolk" is indeed mentioned in the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)