Talk:Robert Honywood (New Romney MP)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Mellohi! in topic Requested move 17 August 2022

Requested move 17 August 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Robert Honywood (New Romney MP). (closed by non-admin page mover)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 21:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


Robert HoneywoodRobert Honywood (1601–1686) – Creating discussion after revert of bold move. Seems clear that his family name is Honywood ([1]), not Honeywood - although this is a common mis-spelling, or alternative spelling (along with Honiwood or Henewood). There is an abundance of sources for Honywood, including the Dictionary of National Biography (which I have added to the article along with his full date of birth); several pre-existing sources in the article also support this spelling, including Pepys and Hieron-Horridge. Disambiguation required due to other people named Robert Honywood. wjematherplease leave a message... 16:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 20:48, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Following discussion below, I support an alternative target of Robert Honywood (MP for New Romney). Usual simple disambiguation by occupation or role, e.g. "politician" or "MP", would be ambiguous due to the MP for Essex (d. 1735) of the same name. wjematherplease leave a message... 06:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
What is the standard format here? I think I've usually seen articles using the format Robert Honywood (New Romney MP). Graham (talk) 03:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Seems to be a mix of both; personally, I think "MP for..." is most unambiguous, but either works for me. wjematherplease leave a message... 08:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

If the sources say he is spelled "Honywood" then I would support change. I think either name (years) or name (occupation/role) works fine. Fredlesaltique (talk) 22:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

On mobile so can't edit, but the "Robert Honywood (occupation/role)" is more in line with the style guide, to differenciate from the other Robert Honywood (cricketer). If MP looks clunky, you could consider "politician", "statesman" or something similar. Quote from WP:NCPDAB - If there is no usual form of conventional disambiguation, place a disambiguating tag in parentheses after the name. Examples:

William Henry (gunsmith), William Henry (chemist), William Henry (congressman), William Henry (actor). The disambiguator is usually a noun indicating what the person is noted for being in their own right. In most cases, these nouns are standard, commonly used tags such as "(musician)" and "(politician)". Avoid using abbreviations or anything capitalized or containing hyphens, dashes, or numbers, that is apart from instances where more specific guidelines specify particular exceptions. If possible, limit the tag to a single, recognizable and highly applicable term. Fredlesaltique (talk) 22:42, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • As the editor who reverted the bold move, I am not going to oppose this request (or a different disambiguator), but I still think it was worth discussing. The only source in the article that I was able to access directly, the Willis Notitia Parliamentaria, spelled the name "Honeywood", and seems to be a comprehensive source. Dekimasuよ! 02:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Graham: Robert Honywood (politician) or (statesman) is the recommended format, since the only other one is Robert Honywood (cricketer). See the style guide at WP:NCPDAB Fredlesaltique (talk) 04:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

As above, disambiguating with simply politician or statesman would not be unambiguous due to his grandson, the MP for Essex, who is presumed notable per WP:NPOL. wjematherplease leave a message... 08:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Wjemather: does his grandson have a wiki page? Fredlesaltique (talk) 12:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Fredlesaltique: I'm working on a draft; I could move what I have already into mainspace (if that makes things simpler). wjematherplease leave a message... 12:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Wjemather: If his grandson doesn't have an article, then Robert Honywood (politician) is recommended, and I think we should change it for now. If/when his grandson does have an article, then style guide at WP:NCPDAB recommends changing to Robert Honywood (politician, born 1601) and the other guy would be Robert Honywood (politician, born ????). It's Wikipedia so not a big deal in my opinion to change this article to (politician) then change to (politician, born year) if necessary. Fredlesaltique (talk) 12:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
What in WP:NCPDAB recommends using the birth year where another qualifier is available? (And in the case of the MP who died in 1735, we don't have a birth year so we would use a death year in the parenthetical, if we used any year at all.) Graham (talk) 00:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Believe it or not, I drafted a stub last night that I was going to put up today! I just put the contents at User:Graham11/Robert Honywood in case it's still useful. Graham (talk) 00:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.