 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Copyright.Yes I got bits text from Pitt-Rivers.I'll rephrase it completely .I doubt they'd mind though I link to them and they use a lot of Wiki info and pics themselves Notafly (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Mea culpa. Hope it's fixed now. Now I really look into it he is interesting but not a lot more. Nice website though and some early stereo photos. It's the Paris collections that count. Hoping to have info on those soon.Notafly (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for rewriting it! It looks fine now. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)