Talk:Robert Hyde (judge)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

Latest comment: 10 years ago6 comments6 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

– No clear primary topic. The judge appears to be the most significant of the 5 people listed at Robert Hyde (disambiguation), but I don't see any evidence that he is more notable than all the others combined. Three of them were MPs, one for more than 30 years. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Support no evidence of primary in G books. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Support, pretty clear lack of a primary topic. The judge's tenure as Lord Chief Justice, though impressive in title, was short and not particularly remarkable. bd2412 T 15:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Support; I should have started the page as "Robert Hyde (judge)" in the first place. 45ossington (talk) 16:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic