Talk:Robert Hyland

Untitled

Comments that are "below-the-vote" that don't need to be there anymore in WP:VfD:

• • Do you just google for someone with the same name who is somewhat famous in order to get a page kept? I can't imagine that you listened to him in the 1950s but it's possible. - Texture 21:38, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • That time I did. Isn't that a good thing? Anthony DiPierro 21:56, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
      • I didn't say that it was and I didn't say that it was not. I'm still deciding. Regardless, it was inappropriate to spring that in and throw "legendary" to confuse both people who have voted and those who haven't. Next time maybe explain the change of target so it can be reevaluated. - Texture 21:59, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
        • Next time I suggest you do a little research before spouting out "delete, vanity." Anthony DiPierro 22:04, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
          • The original listed was indeed vanity. What's the problem? - Texture 22:06, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
            • How can you know it's vanity without doing any research? Anthony DiPierro 22:16, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
              • If you read the article and research shows that there are no programmers of fame as that identified then it is a vanity posting. - Texture 22:25, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
                • So you did do reasearch, but just didn't run across this legendary individual? Anthony DiPierro 22:40, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
                  • I did not run into any legendary programmers. Did you? or are you assuming that the programmer is also a dead radio personality? - Texture 23:21, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Anthony- the next time you completely change the target of an article, can you make a note of that in your comment, as well as in your argument to keep the page here? It's extremely confusing to other voters. - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 21:46, Mar 4, 2004 (UTC)
    • I changed it after I made my vote. Anthony DiPierro 21:56, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
      • I'm confused- you thought the other guy (the attorney) was "Legendary", or you voted, with the intent of changing the target? In either case, both a more descriptive comment and an announcement of your intention with the page here would have been in order. - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 21:59, Mar 4, 2004 (UTC)
        • No, I changed my vote reason after making the change. Anthony DiPierro 22:04, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • The person was changed from a programmer of no fame to this somewhat famous individual - Texture 21:38, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • I think "legendary" individual would be a more appropriate description than "somewhat famous". Anthony DiPierro 22:05, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
      • You didn't even know who he was until you googled him. Not very "legendary" - Texture 22:15, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
        • We better change http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk_radio then. Anthony DiPierro 22:17, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

You criticize me for not explaining the change I made and then you move the explanation of the change to another page? Anthony DiPierro 22:21, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

You indicated that it was changed in your vote. Your vote remains. - Texture 22:24, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Still chuckling, texture? - DropDeadGorgias (talk)

Only when his humour makes a point... ;) - Texture 22:32, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I didn't indicate anything in my vote. Anthony DiPierro 22:40, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)