Talk:Robert L. Bacon

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Military history: Biography / North America / United States / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

Pritzker Military Library Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Requested move

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Not moved. No evidence provided the target is the common name and evidence appears to be to the contrary; Wikipedia's naming conventions specifically address that what is the "official" title of a topic is not a primary consideration.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 08:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Robert L. Bacon → Robert Low Bacon — per official biography --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:44, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oppose In most news coverage and official business he seems to have gone by the middle initial.--Yaksar (let's chat) 21:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. No evidence has been offered that he's more often referred to in this way. The official biography quite possibly uses the full name deliberately, as do we in the article lead, but for the title our policy and practice is not to do so automatically. I note also that the article on his brother Gaspar G. Bacon is similarly named, middle initial only. Andrewa (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Interestingly, the editor seems to have moved that article too, although I have now moved it back per the same rationale.--Yaksar (let's chat) 00:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oho. Very interesting, and quite right to move it back, it's an undiscussed move which User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) knew to be controversial, and as such is gaming the system IMO. I have posted a comment on his talk page. Andrewa (talk) 03:50, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic