Talk:Robert L. Eichelberger

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2600:1700:3A51:590:3DD5:18BD:DE44:FFFB in topic Kid
Good articleRobert L. Eichelberger has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starRobert L. Eichelberger is part of the Command in the South West Pacific Area series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2012Good article nomineeListed
November 1, 2012WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
December 23, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 12, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that General Robert L. Eichelberger (pictured) was ordered to take Buna, or not come back alive?
Current status: Good article

Error in WW 2 section?

edit

The write-up about his returning the Japanese decorations seems to list three distinct awards, but the first two of them, "Imperial Order of Meiji" and "Order of the Sacred Treasure" take you to the same place. If both of these are, in fact, names for the same decoration, then the write-up should make that clear. If, on the other hand, he received (and vowed to return) three awards, then that's what should be made clear.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The comment above re two links for different awards going to the same place is still true, but the text is under WW1. Can someone please fix. Downsize43 (talk) 10:36, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
The source says: "Eichelberger, who as intelligence officer had many dealings with the Japs, blandly outwitted them, blocking them from taking over areas they wanted. For some Japanese reason, the Japs seemed to admire these efforts. At any rate, they decorated him with the Imperial Order of Meiji, the Order of the Sacred Treasure and the Order of the Rising Sun." The Japanese honors system article say that "the Imperial Order of Meiji was established in 1875, and was later renamed as the Order of the Rising Sun" and the "Order of Meiji was just the original name of the Order of Sacred Treasure" I will see if I can find an expert. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:27, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Robert L. Eichelberger/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DCI2026 (talk · contribs) 01:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC) I'll begin reviewing this article at some point this week, hopefully sooner rather than later. dci | TALK 01:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Early life

edit

Re: "He grew up on the 235 acres (95 ha) family farm", it is traditional to refer to the "acres" in the singular when attached to an object such as "farm", eg. "the 200 acre farm". Downsize43 (talk) 01:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

World War I

edit

Last para. The sentence "The American Expeditionary Force Siberia was withdrawn in April 1920." should be the last one in the para, not the first. Downsize43 (talk) 01:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Checklist

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

The review is incredibly late; throughout my readings of the article I found no egregious or even remotely notable errors.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Robert L. Eichelberger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Kid

edit

Kid error 2600:1700:3A51:590:3DD5:18BD:DE44:FFFB (talk) 13:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply