Talk:Robert Largan
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Free school meals
editA user hopping across IP addresses is re-adding the material regarding a vote against free school meals. We don't need to list individual votes here, unless they're deemed to be notable, which no source is currently justifying. If you wish to include this information please explain your reasoning here; I suspect the insistence on including this info is more an attempt to disparage the subject rather than a belief it is genuinely notable. — Czello 07:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Plagiarism issue/potential conflict of Interest
editPlease note that an IP editor made a large edit on this page which contained multiple copy-paste sentences from the subject's speeches and his website. I have removed or reworded these in the career sections but have not yet reviewed the Beliefs and Campaigns sections so there may be more instances there.
The IP editor also removed cited material on the subject's voting record and his previous unsuccessful candidacies, and added comments of "wide praise" for the subject which were not supported by the sources. Given the above, the IP editor appears to have a bias towards the subject. Potentially there may also be a conflict of interest, given the geolocation of the editing IP is within one mile of the publicly stated location of the subject's current Administrative Assistant, but obviously that may be simple coincidence. SFB 20:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Electoral fraud investigation
editHe is under investigation by police for pretending to stand for Labour and Reform parties in misleading posts. 82.2.41.189 (talk) 12:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I dare you to add something about this to the main article. Just see how long it takes for one of the usual suspects to revert your change as "not relevant". 92.40.217.211 (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you look at it now you'll see I've added something :) It might count as "not relevant" just because it's ongoing; it's similar to what was going on with Angela Rayner. Ellwat (talk) 15:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)