Talk:Robert Mapplethorpe

Latest comment: 2 years ago by BR20 DaCrazy in topic Robert on CDi

Benjamin Greene

edit

I'm not sure that the "Benjamin Greene" reference is correct. Robert worked a great deal with a gay porn actor/model named Thomas (whose last name escapes me). His porn name was Joe Simmons, and he passed away in '96. Is there a source for this name "Benjamin Greene"? If not, it should be removed or modified.

"homoerotic"

edit

I have to say that it seems as if this article highly glosses over the fact that MAJOR portions of Mapplethorpe's work (certainally at least 25% of it) were hardly simply "homoerotic", but in fact graphic, sexually explicit photographs of controversial sexual acts such as fisting and so forth... Pacian 06:44, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • I added a sentence describing Mapplethorpe's famous (or infamous) bullwhip pic, since he received a great deal of publicity for this photo. I have to wonder, is it really accurate to say:

    He is perhaps best remembered, however, for his series of closeup photographs of flowers. These highly polished and stylized photographs showed the plants' reproductive parts in extreme detail, intended to echo his more conventional homoerotic works. Mapplethorpe's treated his prints like paintings; he employed special printing techniques and gave them exotic frames.

    IMO, to the extent people have heard of Mapplethorpe at all, they think of the bullwhip pic and the NEA controversy. Firebug 06:52, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Isn't it true that he was homo-kinkazoidal?

added some more information

edit

Hi there
Good call above, I think.

I've added information about where Mapplethorpe is buried and one especially notable book of his photographs that was issued after his death. I think the article could benefit from a list of his commonly available photography books, such as The Black Book, Ten by Ten, etc. I'll try to put one together, but if anyone would like to start, go for it...

Should I put Autoportrait in the bibliography? Is that where a list of his own work would go as well?

Cheers.

Math Tinder 04:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Photos

edit

More fair use images should be added for a more representative display of his work. I'm collecting some high quality scans to consider for this... Any suggestions for works to include? Including more images would be consistent with other articles about artists, such as Rembrandt. Tomyumgoong 17:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

We should have a representative sample of each of the major genres in which he worked. I would especially encourage you to include some of his great floral prints that are frequently overlooked. The hard part will be finding fair use images. SteveHopson 18:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
I agree entirely. Flowers, self portraits, celebrity portraits, gay bondage, some of his work with the female body and so on. Tomyumgoong 18:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'd kind of like to see someone upload one of his self-portraits - he did so many and it seems like a shame that none are on here. One which would be particularly appropiate and ironic, considering his status as a lightning-rod for controversy, would be the photo of him holding a gun standing underneath and inverted pentagram. Does anyone know if any of these are fair use? LittleRoughRhinestone 23:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

The infamous "bullwhip" photo

edit

I don't believe that the link which is posted, which purportedly links to Mapplethorpe's "bullwhip" photo, is correct. There are at least two, maybe three self-portraits which Mapplethorpe made of himself with some kind of whip inserted into his anal cavity (like this one [1], for example), and the one that is linked to seems to have the least potential out of all of them to shock or offend. Could someone knowledgeable clear this up, potentially? LittleRoughRhinestone 23:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is there a legal problem in putting the above link in the article? Would it break copyright, for instance? Michael Glass 00:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
As no-one has commented, I have put the link into the article. Michael Glass 00:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Weasel Words

edit

The general feeling of the section I tagged seems to be defending Mapplethorpe and using loaded language to criticize the vies of his opponents. Any thoughts? --Scorpios 20:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have removed words that appeared to sanitise the article. Any feedback? Michael Glass 01:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Mapplethorpe Tryptics

edit

I just finished watching "Dirty Pictures", a docudrama about the Cincinnati trial. In that they made many references to his Tryptics. Pictures that have more artistic merit as a set than they do apart. I just tried looking up more information on this and found nothing. Can anybody add a section here expanding on this topic? Gbeacock 07:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Gord BeacockReply

The word is spelled "triptych." Maybe that will help. TJLink 19:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Weasel words

edit
  • This controversy was not accidental, as Mapplethorpe intended to use his unquestionable skills as a classic photographer to display gay sexuality. Mapplethorpe's work functions in a postmodern sense on many levels and raises a variety of questions regarding the lexicon of the classic male nude and its tie to sexuality, the role and construction of gender and sexuality in society, the role of form and content in traditional and contemporary art, the communicative aspect of imagery, and censorship issues regarding museum space, tax dollars, and, in a general sense, all imagery.

I removed the above section as it is written in a gushing, fan-site tone of adoration not suitable for an encyclopaedia and without sources it constitutes personal opinion at worst, original research at best. --Brideshead 09:17, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


Death

edit

I think it is worth having some information about how he died. He died of AIDS in 1989, I think it is worth including this detail in his biography. I actually visited this page to find out how he died, but I had to look elsewhere.Wizlop (talk) 13:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Particularly about the UCE controversy. Can we get some? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.179.88.59 (talk) 16:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Clarification on UCE controversy

edit

The article about the UCE controversy needs to be clarified. It does not give a comprehensive description of the explicit photo's themselves. 69.18.107.10 (talk) 04:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

sexuality

edit

I know many people think that Robert Mapplethorpe was gay/homosexual because of his homoerotic art but I've read numerous biographies where he is described as being bisexual and he did have romantic and fulfilling sexual relationships with both men and women including people such as Patti Smith (he and Patti Smith were lovers) and Lisa Lyon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.74.185 (talk) 09:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please specifically cite one or more of those sources if you change the article again. Controversial unsourced edits may be reverted. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 10:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

How does one put a source in an article? It's a well known fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.238.240.59 (talk) 07:45, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Instructions on how to add sources are at WP:Citing sources. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
List of bisexual people: G–M gives a reference "Mapplethorpe A biography, Patricia Morrisroe. 1995. Random House Inc.", which I happen to own. There's no reference to the word bisexual in the index, the only reference to orientation in the index, pages 57-60, documents his relationship with Patti Smith but the talks about his gay, not bisexual, identity coming out. While I might be tempted personally identify Mapplethrope as bisexual based on the Smith relationship, WP use of orientation is presumed to rest on self-identification, and again, Morrisroe's book doesn't provide sourcing for RM as bisexual. Several parts of that book clearly do describe him as or as self-id'ing as homosexuality, the closest exception I could find (and it's a large book) was page 230 thought of himself as "mostly homosexual". --je deckertalk 19:46, 14 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

That makes him bisexual then. If he were really actually gay or homosexual he would be fully/completely gay/homosexual and not attracted to any woman at all let alone Patti Smith or Lisa Lyons or the other women he had as lovers, and he would not have self identified as "mostly homosexual".

"Mostly homosexual" is just another term for being bisexual. It's like how there are people who consider themselves "mostly straight" or "heteroflexible" and these are both just terms for being bisexual since if you are really straight/hetero you're not going to be attracted to the same sex/gender at all. To claim that Robert Mapplethorpe is not bisexual is an example of biphobia and bisexual erasure.

If wikipedia judges someone's sexual orientation based on how they self identify what about if the person was gay or bisexual and closeted and called themselves "straight" or if they did not identify as either gay or bisexual during their lifetime?

These articles also identifies Mapplethorpe as being bisexual. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/are-his-pictures-art--or-merely-porn-1148157.html and http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/art/Robert-Mapplethorpe-Photographer-who-shed.5967314.jp —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.251.243 (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Since the publishing of "Just Kids" the book written by Patti Smith about her life with Mapplethorpe, it is now known he was not only attracted to males but also females so he was bisexual not gay. It could be great if Wikipedia does respect his memory and his sexuality. he is not a gay icon but a biseuxal icon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.123.78.214 (talk) 09:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

The issue of whether an individual is "really" bisexual or gay is considerably more complicated than that, and as stated above, Wikipedia's use of sexual orientation markers rests heavily on the individual's self-identification. Absent any indication that Mapplethorpe self-identified as "bisexual", it's inappropriate to use that word in an unqualified way. (On the other hand, it would be acceptable to say "Mapplethorpe was described as bisexual by reliable sources X, Y and Z" to make the point that there is some dispute over the accuracy of the term.) —Tim Pierce (talk) 16:19, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mapplethorpe was described as bisexual in the book JUST KIDS, written by his lover of several years and lifelong friend Patti Smith. There are many examples similar to this: "We had a beautiful day that blossomed into an unusually passionate night. I wrote happily of this night in my diary, adding a small heart like a teenage girl." JUST KIDS, page 134. Younggoldchip (talk) 15:08, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I think we'd all agree that Patti Smith knew Mapplethorpe better than almost everyone. According to her "Just Kids" autobiography, and her straightforward description of Mapplethorpe's sexual activities and the way he himself regarded them, he was a bisexual who preferred men. In Smith's view, bisexuals almost always prefer one sex, although they may have romantic relationships with both. The French writer Colette, for example, had bisexual experience but (according to Judith Thurman's biography) clearly preferred men. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Younggoldchip (talkcontribs) 21:35, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Furthermore - the depiction of her in this article as Mapplethorpe's "roommate" harkens back to the 1950s when "roommate" was used in place of lover/partner. By all accounts - including Patti's book - they were sexual partners throughout their time living together. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.254.42.142 (talk) 02:58, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's a well known biographic fact that Mapplethorpe was bisexual, and not gay as he was lovers/partners with both Patti Smith and then Lisa Lyon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.34.201.195 (talk) 14:05, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Surely then, even if bisexual is the sticking-point, we ought to honour the known facts of his sexual behaviour, and let the gay label stay as it is.
The sentence summing up his and Patti's friendship, which runs, They created art together, and maintained a close relationship, ought to be followed by something like,This relationship was a sexual one.
I would add it myself, but for fear of being slapped down. Nuttyskin (talk) 17:29, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation?

edit

As in "Maple", or to rhyme with "Apple"? DS (talk) 11:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

As in "maple".
Peter Isotalo 08:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Movie Dirty Pictures

edit

The movie [2] has an article on de (de:Dirty Pictures). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.73.132.119 (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

There's a see also to our page on it, here. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:27, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sam Wagstaff

edit

Why doesn't this article mention Sam Wagstaff? Mapplethorpe's long-time lover and patron? I'm no art expert, and I don't feel qualified to edit, but this absence baffles me. --Joan S. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.28.12.219 (talk) 20:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Assuming that there is reliable sourcing, I don't see any reason why not. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:00, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

On refined aesthetics

edit

One of the phrases of the biography section reads "In the 1980s he refined his aesthetic, photographing statuesque male and female nudes, delicate flower still lifes, and highly formal portraits of artists and celebrities".

Is the term "refine" appropriate here , as it seems more like a switch in subject matter? It sounds too much as a personal opinion assuming that his aesthetic wasn't refined before.

I don't want to just edit it out before hearing more opinions on it first.

--tregiani (talk) 16:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

That's a good question, and I'm not sure what the right answer is. I agree with you that the phrase sounds wrong, but I also note that the context is his expanding from photos of friends, etc., to more composed subject matter. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
"By the 1980's his subject matter for photography focussed on female nudes, delicate flower still lifes, and formal portraits of artists and celebrities." Bus stop (talk) 22:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that's much better. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done, with a few minor tweaks. Thanks. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Robert Mapplethorpe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Robert on CDi

edit

There was a CDi "game" called "The Flowers of Robert Mapplethorpe" that I've become aware of thanks to episode 96 of AVGN (Lester the Unlikely). I find it strange that it's not here, especially since it appeared in such a popular web show. How come? BR20 DaCrazy (talk) 18:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply