Neutrality Violation - Why is Robert Matthews listed as a "religious impostor" or "con artist"?

edit

Just because he didn't have a following that survives until today doesn't make him different from any other historical religious figure. Any self-proclaimed "prophet" can be called a "religious impostor" by the same criterion. (By anyone who does not believe that that figure is a "prophet"). Epikouros (talk) 08:34, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply