Talk:Robert Stanton (merchant)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from Robert Stanton (merchant) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:19, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the former member of parliament Robert Stanton took part in a mock election (pictured) while in prison?
Source: Willard Bissell Pope, ed., The Diary of Benjamin Robert Haydon, vol. III (Harvard University Press, 1960), pp. 209, 215
- Reviewed: SS Choctaw
Created by Moonraker (talk). Self-nominated at 02:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC).
Major copyright and close paraphrasing issues with the webpage from historyofparliamentonline.org. Earwig's confidence is the highest I've ever seen at 77.6% for that page and there are dozens of individual statements that are either directly coppied or are far to close to the original. Close parapharsing is still an issue, even if it's not the exact wording the source article uses. Footlessmouse (talk) 23:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review, Footlessmouse. Close paraphrasing is unavoidable with a highly condensed biography full of facts, but I have taken out some material not needed. What Earwig is still finding is three quotations, in quotation marks, and they are all from sources which are out of copyright. Moonraker (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! (P.S. I apologize for rushing to judgement here. I see that you have a solid track record and I should have just left a note with my concerns) Footlessmouse (talk) 09:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reviewing
- Article is well written, neutral and well supported by inline citations
- Long enough.
- Hook is short enough, correctly formatted and supported by inline citation.
- Copyvio issue on Earwig has been resolved. Only verbatims are within quotation marks.
- QPQ done
- Image is PD and satisfactory res.
- Looks good to go, Papamac (talk) 14:13, 12 December 2020 (UTC)