Talk:Robert Trappl

Latest comment: 17 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic WikiProject class rating

Relevance of this article

edit

The relevance of this article is questionable.--193.171.142.61 12:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

This article is "just" a beginning, and these kinds of article often do not yet give a very complete image of the subject. If you have anymore notable information please let us know, or improve the article yourselve. - Mdd 14:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
I was referring to the relevance of the person. I am not aware of any major contributions he did to the subject of cybernetics, apart from bringing the right people together for collaboration (resulting in all his books..). If there are any, I'm curious about them.--193.171.142.52 15:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
With a google rate of more then 50.000, to my experience, he should be notable. The problem with these kind of scientists is however, that you need to be an expert in his field, to be able to determing which of his contributions realy are more notable then others. Are you such an expert?
The reason why I find this person important is, because of work for the International Federation for Systems Research (IFSR) and all his editoral work around it. As president of the ISFR he helped to establish the field of systems science. - Mdd 11:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply