Talk:Robyn discography

Fair use rationale for Image:Robynsbest.jpg

Image:Robynsbest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Robynuk.jpg

Image:Robynuk.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Body Talk Pt 2

I think since it has a release date now we can add it to the Article under Body talk Pt 1, id do it but i dont know how to add rows or anything —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.96.113 (talk) 08:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Hang with me

Hang with me reached No. 68 in Germany, so please add it SOURCE--79.216.219.42 (talk) 17:50, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

New Column in albums section

i think canada should be added to the charting of her albums, 3 of her albums have charted there (robyn: 29, body talk pt1: 54 body talk pt 2: 34) they are reasonably good charting positions i think and deserve to be added —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.58.160 (talk) 22:54, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Body Talk Series

I've re-listed Body Talk parts 1,2 and 3 as Mini albums (mini LP's) as it's obvious that is what Robyn intended them to be and according to the UK charts company anything over 4 original songs or 25 minutes is classed as a mini LP and not an EP. Does anybody dissagree with this? --82.13.83.30 (talk) 19:07, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Indestructible

so Indestructible is not listed to be included in body part 3, it is, change it back! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.154.102.90 (talk) 13:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Robyn discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120521214300/http://www.ifpi.se/wp-content/uploads/guld-platina-1987-1998.pdf to http://www.ifpi.se/wp-content/uploads/guld-platina-1987-1998.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160101180730/http://www.ifpi.se/wp-content/uploads/ar-20033.pdf to http://www.ifpi.se/wp-content/uploads/ar-20033.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150117070449/http://www.ifpi.dk/?q=content%2Fguld-og-platin-i-august to http://www.ifpi.dk/?q=content%2Fguld-og-platin-i-august

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)