Talk:Rock carvings at Alta

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2604:2000:12C1:44F5:E84B:F5A1:F6C4:D61C in topic new/ old interpretation (true)
Former featured article candidateRock carvings at Alta is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 11, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 19, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
April 27, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article candidate

Elk and moose

edit

Why does everyone in Norway insist on referring to the elk as moose? The term 'moose' refers to the American elk (Alces alces americanus and Alces alces gigas), an animal which has never existed in Europe. The correct term for the species Alces Alces is 'elk'. This is also in keeping with the UK English used in the article (e.g. Archaeology (UK) instead of archeology (US)) Grumpy444grumpy 14:58, 12 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rock carvings at Alta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

new/ old interpretation (true)

edit

there's a hypothesis gaining momentum that the art depicts a future day; artist's vision gifted while wrestling with agaric; ragnarokian glimpse. many consider it a message of hope and there's evidence that the culture was aware of CO2 levels and knew (via ancient scandinavian sciences and thinking really hard) that humans would figure it all out: build a huge boat (spaceship) and leave for the moon/ mars/ abode of odin, accompanied by flying reindeer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:12C1:44F5:E84B:F5A1:F6C4:D61C (talk) 23:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply