Talk:Roderick Chisholm

Philosophy: Philosophers / Metaphysics / Epistemology / Logic / Analytic / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Metaphysics
	Epistemology
	Logic
	Analytic philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Chisholm an incompatibilist.

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, folks. This is my first venture into wikipedia world, so I hope I'm obeying the rules.

I made a few changes here, mainly additions (it's important to note that Chisholm was a foundationalist; and that D. C. Williams was co-director of his thesis; and I added some books). The only major change I made was about whether Chisholm was a libertarian about free will (and so an incompatibilist) or a compatibilist. He argued forefully for the incompatibility of freedom and determinism, and I don't believe he ever took that back. So I eliminated the bit about "some people think it's a version of compatibilism" -- although, if there are people who say this, it might be worth mentioning, to clear the matter up. Still, I've never heard anyone say this, even.

Now, there is the question whether "agent causation" requires indeterminism; or might be compatible with determinism. I have heard of compatibilists who wanted to posit agent causation. But so far as I know, Chisholm doesn't address that question; and in any case, he always says that free action requires indeterminism.

Thanks very much to whoever started this entry on a great philosopher, and a kind and generous man.

From what I know your changes are correct. However, I think this article needs to be reworked. The intro section is just too long, and the rest of the article contains very little. So, the beginning needs to be shortened and put into the rest of the article, and also hopefully expanded. I could give it a try (although I don't know too much about him) when I get a chance in a month or two. If anyone wants to do it in the meantime that'd be great. - 142.151.161.204 (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I propose that Epistemological particularism be merged into this article. I think that the content in the concept epistemological particularism needs to be explained in the context of the author who created it, especially in so far as it not so common elsewhere. Hérisson de Cloche 06:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Vote about the merging

Support - As said above, Hérisson de Cloche

The proposal is inappropriate since the term is no longer author-specific. The term also appears in the work of Ernest Sosa. --Omnipaedista (talk) 04:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:33, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic