Talk:Roderick Lim
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Talk header}}
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Notable publications are:[according to whom?]
editThe publications have been selected based on the impact factor. The impact factor (IF) of an academic journal is a measure reflecting the average number of citations to recent articles published in the journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field, with journals with higher impact factors deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_Factor). Therefore, the publication list of Rod Lim contains a selection of papers which have been published in the highest ranked journals. --Indlekoferw (talk) 08:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- The IF is a very crude and unreliable metric to measure the impact, and even less the quality, of an individual article. A more reliable way of determining notable papers would be if somebody had written about Lim and mentioned some papers as especially noteworthy (but we generally have to wait until we have an obituary before we get something like that for an academic) or, for example, list those articles that have been cited most frequently. And just 3-5 (max) would be fine. --Randykitty (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Proposal: citation for 2008 Pierre-Gilles de Gennes Prize
edit- 2008 Pierre-Gilles de Gennes Prize[1]
References
- ^ "2008 Pierre-Gilles de Gennes winner Roderick Lim with co-chairs". epfl.ch. 2008-06-10. Retrieved 2015-02-03.
Sources
editThe information comes from a reliable source. The website is from an institute which belongs to the University of Basel. This is a public university which is owned by the state. So I don't see any problem with COI. There are no financial interests. If more sources will be available they can still used to be better references. --Micha 12:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micha L. Rieser (talk • contribs)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)