Talk:Rog-O-Matic
Latest comment: 10 years ago by ZipoBibrok5x10^8 in topic Authoritative sources
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
References
editI don't see what further references would be desired. Maybe that comment is old? Drbobpgh (talk) 18:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- May 2007. I think the article is well-sourced for its shortness, so I'm going to remove the template. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Authoritative sources
editnot certain how authoritative are the cited sources (Billinghurst)
- Source is a (almost) full collection of existing and new press/scientific sources about Rogue/Rog-O-Matic. ZipoBibrok5x10^8 (talk) 22:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Quote the original source, not a page like science-fiction.fch.ir/rogue/doc/Rogue_1984-The_DOS_Game-The_History-The_Science.html which is definitely not the authoritative reference. See Wikipedia:Citing sources. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Did you know that the "non authoritative" source, as you call it according to your personal interpretation, published exclusive scientific articles, including the cited one, not to be found elsewhere in the whole web? --ZipoBibrok5x10^8 (talk) 16:35, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Quote the original source, not a page like science-fiction.fch.ir/rogue/doc/Rogue_1984-The_DOS_Game-The_History-The_Science.html which is definitely not the authoritative reference. See Wikipedia:Citing sources. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)