Talk:Roger Cardinal (art historian)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Lennart97 in topic Requested move 7 September 2021
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 7 September 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Roger Cardinal. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 7 September 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Roger Cardinal (art historian) → Roger Cardinal – Per WP:ONEOTHER, as Roger Cardinal (director) receives almost no views. 162 etc. (talk) 15:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @162 etc. and Inwind: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- both articles are fairly nondescript. Still prefer disambiguation over hatnote. Inwind (talk) 15:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with Inwind. No ptopic. The pageview stats are within the same ballpark for both. Besides, Roger Cardinal (director) has only existed for a week and change, so we don't have a very large sample size to judge its views. Colin M (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. No WP:PTOPIC under either criterion. Narky Blert (talk) 10:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.