Talk:Roger Kibbe

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi in topic Meaningless true-crime coverage
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Roger Kibbe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Meaningless true-crime coverage

edit

This article has the usual meaningless true-crime-TV listings seen in so many other crime articles, in this case

Roger Kibbe's crimes were covered in an episode of Forensic Files on Court TV (now TruTV) during season three.[10][11] Kibbe's case was also covered in the documentary film called "Profiling Evil" that was broadcast on MSNBC.[12]

The citations for these shows are the shows themselves, and that's not enough. Absent a source explaining how these shows tell the reader something about the subject, they have no function in the article. There's no more reason to call them out in the article text than there is to list every newspaper report on the case. EEng 19:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

I agree. These shows had no bearing on the case, its investigation, or subsequent events- so they are trivial mentions here. WP:NOTTVGUIDE springs to mind, as does WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 19:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply