Talk:Rolls-Royce Gem

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Name

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The 'Gem' name fits in with Bristol-Siddeley's naming scheme which it inherited from Metrovick, in that 'Gem' is the generic name for gemstones such as the Beryl and Sapphire.

It's actually a de Havilland name, beginning with a G. Did Metrovick have any involvement with it? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Metrovick was long gone by the time of the BS 360, however their engine projects had been taken over by Armstrong Siddeley and I suspect after their subsequent merger with the Bristol Aeroplane Company, and later Rolls-Royce, the former de Havilland designers may have had a hand in the design.

Due to the rather convoluted merger process between the various UK engine and airframe companies the genesis of various engines or aircraft can be somewhat confusing, e.g., the last de Havilland design produced at Hatfield was in fact the BAe 146. Surprisingly both the 146 and the Trident were actually DH designs.

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rolls-Royce Gem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101217024018/http://www.rolls-royce.com/Images/Gem_tcm92-6705.pdf to http://www.rolls-royce.com/Images/Gem_tcm92-6705.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic