Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Worcester
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Article title
editThis article and the one at Anglican Diocese of Worcester are disambiguated by their denomination, but as the English diocese was a Roman Catholic one from its foundation in the seventh century until the reformation, then would they not be better disambiguated geographically? JimmyGuano (talk) 17:28, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Great point, Jimmy. JKeck (talk) 03:18, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Roman Catholic Diocese of Worcester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928100142/http://www.worcesterdiocese.org/bishopsoffice/Pastoral_Planning/Cluster%201Cluster%20%202.pdf to http://www.worcesterdiocese.org/bishopsoffice/Pastoral_Planning/Cluster%201Cluster%20%202.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:09, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Roman Catholic Diocese of Worcester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070904121218/http://www.catholicfreepress.org:80/parishes.html to http://www.catholicfreepress.org/parishes.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Map
editCertainly the map is pretty standard for maps of dioceses on Wikipedia, but it's also basically useless for locating the diocese's boundaries in the real world. There need to be some landmarks (e.g., highways, towns) on the map to make it actually useful and not simply schematic/iconic. JKeck (talk) 03:18, 15 March 2020 (UTC)