Talk:Roman Renaissance

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Johnbod in topic Period and title

Period and title

edit

Most histories would end a chapter on the Renaissance in Rome with the Sack of Rome (1527). In the arts, the following period of the cinquecento is that of Mannerism. --Wetman (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sure! The page was translated from it.wiki where it is stile "work in progress". Today I developed the Sixtus IV and Innocentius VIII paragraphs... Alexander VI and the 16th century coming soon... --Sailko (talk) 21:19, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Sack finally added - a bit. Johnbod (talk) 17:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

When I started editing this piece it was virtually unreadable, some parts were gibberish. Not only was the grammar horrendous, there was no proper sequence, and it was unfinished. Also a lot had been copy and pasted from its sources. This had not been picked up. Yet my editing was. I don't understand why there are copyright issues anyway, when nobody is claiming authorship or stands to gain from it. I rendered the article readable, sequential, filled in a lot of detail, and all in the shortest possible time. Only history professor with a library full of books could have done better, and who is going to do that for nothing?. So as far as I am concerned you can stick editing where the sun don't shine. It ain't worth the aggravation OddsBodkins (talk) 10:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by OddsBodkins (talkcontribs) 10:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)Reply