Talk:Roman provincial currency

Latest comment: 12 years ago by 172.190.37.56 in topic Source?

Untitled

edit

I would like to work on the section, as the current section is only a stub. I will add references from my library and try to bring this up to a professional level. I will have a real user ID as soon as the system lets me register. I modified the existing text to correct the text and remove factual errors. 24.164.57.247 10:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)RBobicusReply

Moved

edit

I would like to know why this was moved without a discussion Enlil Ninlil (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

IMHO there isn't any reason for this move. In literature this coins are always under the name of "Roman Provincial Coins" or, previously, "Greek Imperial Coins" . --Carlo Morino aka zi' Carlo 12:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks mate, I do not care about the name, just the move. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 01:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
The move was surely a mistake: the page could be at "Greek Imperial ..." or "Roman provincial ...", but not "Roman Imperial ..." -- that's something quite different, about which we have no separate article at present. "Roman provincial coinage" is the clearest name, and I propose to move to that if no one objects. Andrew Dalby 16:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Fixed.
Sowlos (talk) 18:19, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Source?

edit

"There are several cities which are only known by their coins, as there is no historical mention of them." - Alas, no reference(s) for this very intriguing tidbit of information. It would be nice to source this statement so similarly intrigued people could perhaps learn more elsewhere.--172.190.37.56 (talk) 08:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply