Talk:Romantic Rights (song)
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Dfarr.jpg
edit
Image:Dfarr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
#c-BetacommandBot-2007-06-03T02:32:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:Dfarr.jpg){kind=link}
Requested move 10 August 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: EP article moved back to base name and leave song as is for now. The consensus is that they should be merged, but going with Andrewa's suggestion of moving the EP, since (a) it was at the base name anyway until 2007, and (b) it has a slightly older history than the song article. The song should be merged into the EP and then redirected though. — Amakuru (talk) 14:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Romantic Rights (song) → Romantic Rights – No need for a dab with two entries, especially since they will be interlinked a lot... ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 01:39, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Merge the EP is just a product variant of the song. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Support, or better still move Romantic Rights (EP) over the DAB, in preparation for a merge as suggested above. Both articles are already comprehensive and still fairly short, so the merge makes perfect sense. But the merged article should end up at the base name, and better to keep the page history of one of the two pages with the content, so one of them should be moved to the base name first. Either would do. Andrewa (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nom, delete the DAB page, and Merge and Redirect Romantic Rights (EP) into Death_from_Above_discography. The EP is not independently notable. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.