Talk:Rome: Total War: Alexander

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Attribution

edit

Game Information

edit

Shouldn't the article have more to do with how well the game sold etc, rather than acting more as a gameplay guide? 203.59.21.211 (talk) 12:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

BUY?

edit

Isnt this a downloadable game? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.211.218.179 (talk) 12:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rename article

edit

I suggest renaming the article to Rome: Total War - Alexander. That's how MobyGames lists it, at least. SharkD (talk) 08:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

More discussion has occured here. SharkD (talk) 01:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Rome: Total War: Alexander. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply