Talk:Romeo & Juliet: Sealed with a Kiss/GA2
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Mediran (talk · contribs) 02:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC) I will review. :)
Review coming soon.
Review
edit- Infobox -- Good
- BTW, change {{start date}} to {{film date}} per WP:FILMRELEASE
- Lead
- "Romeo & Juliet: Sealed with a Kiss is a 2006 animated family fantasy film loosely following..." You need to specify that the film is an American production. I would suggest "Romeo & Juliet: Sealed with a Kiss is a 2006 American animated family fantasy film loosely following..."
- Plot
- "but warns them that they will be in big trouble if Prince finds out." Is this a name? or some title for monarch weirdos? Well I know this is a title but just to be sure.
- Fixed it 和DITOREtails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Again for "Prince, jealous of Juliet's affection for Romeo..."
- Fixed it 和DITOREtails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- And "and Prince finds a new mate..."
- Fixed it 和DITOREtails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Voice cast
- I would suggest to rename the section to "Cast and characters" or to something else. Since the section also discusses what the characters are. If you think it's OK now, don't change it around.
- Nibbelink as The Prince. Firstly, the t in "The Prince" should not be capitalized.
- Why Nibbelink's first name not here? As for the previous review, the "surname only" is necessary to make it more encyclopedic but this is only for paragraphs I think. "Phil" should be added here.
- First name added, so
Done 和DITOREtails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- First name added, so
- Why Nibbelink's first name not here? As for the previous review, the "surname only" is necessary to make it more encyclopedic but this is only for paragraphs I think. "Phil" should be added here.
- Release
- Section "Theater" rename to "Theatrical release"?
- Was the film rated by the MPAA? If yes, please add their rating. If not, leave it as is. But I'm sure it was rated of course.
- Appearently not, according to this search. 和DITOREtails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- See here. American films cannot be released without an MPAA review/rating.
- Appearently not, according to this search. 和DITOREtails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Critical reception
- Link "Hannah-Barbera" and "Cartoon Network" for those people who're not familiar with (like me).
- I think the review from LA Weekly is available at Wayback Machine. Link their review for clarification and verification.
- According to the interview with Animated Views, Nibbelink won two awards. He said "I won first place in the animation category and Best in Show, so I got two awards." Please add this.
- References
- Ref 7 with "skwigly.co.uk". I would suggest to change it to "Skwigly" and italicize it because it's an online magazine.
- Ref 8 change the "indiantelevision.com" to "Indian Television"
- Ref 9 and 10... change the "hemeroteca.abc.es" to "ABC" and italicize it because it is a Spanich local newspaper. (See ABC)
BTW, the article is very pleasant and it is such a very good little article. Thanks EditorE-- Great work! Mediran (t • c) 03:46, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Final thoughts
Sorry about the delay. Well congratulations! All of my comments above, and the comments from the previous GA review seems have been addressed. I think this article is all good to go. What a little nice article. Thank you very much for the improvements you did. Indeed, very good work EditorE-- well done! Mediran (t • c) 13:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)