Talk:Ronald Skirth/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Binksternet in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Binksternet (talk) 01:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Initial impressions

edit

Failing article

edit

I am failing this article because of major problems with prose, focus, and for too much missing from the man's post-war life. The only image in the article is not a fair use image—it is for a book, not a bio. The article can be brought to GA level only by a great deal of effort, an effort I do not expect to occur. Binksternet (talk) 02:34, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply