Talk:Rorschach test
Latest comment: 1 month ago by 57.135.233.22 in topic Why is this test considered scientific?
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Rorschach test.
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rorschach test article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note: Discussion related to disclosure of information related to the Rorschach test should be conducted at Talk:Rorschach test/disclosure. Please also review the archived discussions on this matter. |
Note: For historical reference, discussion regarding the inclusion of the images primarily happened at WP:Requests for comment/Rorschach test images and Talk:Rorschach test/images. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The inkblots are proprietary information and are used by psychologists to assess personality disorders. These cards should not be readily available online. Please remove them.
More information regarding the problem with having testing materials available to the public can be found here: https://www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/data-disclosure-faqs Semert (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with you. And I did in 2009. But you may wish to read through this RfC and all the other substantial discussions in the archives about this issue. One would need to raise a new RfC, I think. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of R-PAS?
editSeems like a glaring hole in this article. I think this should be updated Time2track (talk) 03:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Can you suggest some reliable sources that explain what R-PAS is? MartinPoulter (talk) 09:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- https://r-pas.org/Home/About
- I can think of no better source than the official website, although there are official textbooks on it Time2track (talk) 18:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Why is this test considered scientific?
editI don't think it is, and the article doesn't explain why it's scientific either. 57.135.233.22 (talk) 23:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)