Talk:Rosalind Creasy
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Rosalind Creasy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 December 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Rosalind Creasy wrote a landmark book on edible landscaping? Source: "Creasy’s landmark “The Complete Book of Edible Landscaping” (Sierra Club Books, 1982) presented fruits and vegetables as artful landscape design, not just human fodder." LA Times
Created by Thriley (talk) and DaffodilOcean (talk). Nominated by Thriley (talk) at 03:22, 26 November 2022 (UTC).
This looks fine. Article is new & long enuf, QPQ done, hook is interesting. No discernable copyvio; AGF on offline sources. Some of the references are very redundant (see "Selected publications") but I think that's outside the scope of a DYK review. Cheers, Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
