Talk:Roscoe Charles Wilson/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Anotherclown in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 12:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Progression
edit- Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
- Version of the article when review was closed: [2]
Technical review
edit- Citations: The Citation Check tool reveals no errors (no action required).
- Disambiguations: no dab links [3] (no action required)
- Linkrot: One External link reports as dead [4].
- "Biographical data on Air Force General Officers"
- Alt text: images lacks alt text so you might consider adding it [5] (suggestion only).
- Copyright violations: The Earwig Tool is currently not working, however spot checks using Google searches reveal no issues (no action required).
Criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- This article is quite well written and I could find no major issues with prose or MOS.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Article seems to cover all major aspects of the subjects life and career.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- No issues with POV.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No issues here.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':
- Images are both PD and seem appropriate for the article.
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- This article easily meets the GA critera in my opinion, so I am happy to pass it. There is a minor technical point above regarding a dead link and the issue of the service dates in the infobox, but none of these prevent the article's promotion. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 21:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)