Talk:Roscosmos
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Roscosmos article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 20 September 2012, it was proposed that this article be moved to Roscosmos. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Conent
editI'm not entirely comfortable compiling an extensive history of the Soviet space program in this article, but I haven't come up with a better idea yet. Nobody told us the name of the Soviet space agency, so we could just make Soviet space program to discuss the topic, then go retrofit all the zillion articles that mention the Soviet space program. Perhaps I'll do that when I get the time (though I wouldn't mind someone else taking it on). -- ke4roh 13:37, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Name
edit- Other names commonly used to refer to the Russian space agency include Russian Federal Space Agency and Russian Space Agency. The aforesaid names might also represent related but different entities. It appears to be certain that Rosaviakosmos or Rosoviakosmos are obsolete names, which the Russian space agency was formerly known by.soviet
Seems that the Russian Federal Space Agency is the correct name. violet/riga (t) 10:44, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Name again
editIf it has been renamed, then should it be moved to Russian Federal Space Agency? Thanx 68.39.174.150 20:15, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Kliper
editI think we should be clear in saying that the Kliper (and it's photo) is just one of the three projects proposed to Roscosmos by various Russian airspace companies. While Molnia's proposal seems a long shot, I would not rule out Khrunichev yet. In particular, the article refers to the Kliper as the project of Roscosmos, whereas it is actually a project of Energia and has been pitched to various potential partners by Energia.
redirect from RASA
editshouldn't RASA be directed to here if Russian aviation and space agency is redirected here?
Startrek
editStartrek logos were clearly copied off Roscosmos logo. HardeeHar (talk) 15:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- And Lego Space, even though both Star Trek and Space Lego predate Roscosmos. Titaniumlegs (talk) 20:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:54, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
English?
editThe entry lacks definite articles and contains other broken English translations. Requires a clean-up by a native English speaker. Doesn't anyone proof read anything here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.197.150 (talk) 03:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Website
editRoscosmos website https://www.roscosmos.ru/ seems to be broken (for more than month now). No CSS style and all links lead to 403 Forbidden.
Maybe this should be mentioned in the article itself.
Dfsdfaf456 (talk) 22:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not without secondary sourcing. Drmies (talk) 22:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Internet Archive (aka Wayback Machine) is secondary sourcing Dfsdfaf456 (talk) 22:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC)