Talk:Rose Madder (novel)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2A02:810B:54C0:E58:CC6D:9F32:A4CE:2135 in topic What ist the age Rating?

Untitled

edit

I put in unusually for a King novel vis a vis Greek mythos since King's horror elements is usually much more reminiscent of the Victorian era, or of Poe - this was a long reach back for him. I liked it. Ellsworth 17:19, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Plagiarized? Seems familiar

edit

The plot of this book seems to be exactly the same as Sleeping With the Enemy by Nancy Price, with the only differences being the addition of the painting and the supernatural elements. Both have a woman married to an abusive man, both have the woman leaving the man and setting up in another town, both have the woman getting a job and meeting a better man, and both have the ex tracking the woman to her new town and threatening her life. Should this be mentioned, and was King ever sued for this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.28.245.169 (talk) 03:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

No, lame cliched plots are not plagiarism. I'm sure there are many other works with the exact same plotline 71.200.184.93 (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Movie?

edit

This book was turned into a movie, was it not? Chubbles 05:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rose Madder has yet to be made into a movie. The story seems like it would translate well to the medium. Master Redyva 12:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

A Query

edit

Sir, I do not mean any disrespect, but I was wondering why you do not consider the last note about the picture, a DARK TOWER reference? This picture was also on the INSOMNIA book, which deals with Tower issues as well as Patrick Danville. Thank you. Master Redyva 21:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC); Master Redyva 17:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Madderking.jpg

edit
 

Image:Madderking.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Anna

edit

Norman is mentioned killing Anna, without establishing who she is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.191.136.70 (talk) 14:05, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

References??

edit

Perhaps it is a glitch or merely an oversight, but I do not see any references. There is not even a section, or heading - even if it's blank. If a more experienced editor than myself or a patient administrator is willing to assist me, I'd like to improve the quality of this article. Msg my talk page if interested.SeaBeeDee SeaBeeDee 06:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC) SeaBeeDee 06:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeaBeeDee (talkcontribs)

What ist the age Rating?

edit

What ist the age Rating? 2A02:810B:54C0:E58:CC6D:9F32:A4CE:2135 (talk) 12:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply