| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rosenhan experiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days  |
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Postman
editThe excerpt of Neil Postman's critique at the bottom smells of postmodern claptrap, without any interesting or unusual insight into the experiment. I propose that it be removed. This was an experiment into psychiatric diagnoses, not the fluid nature of language and semantic uncertainty.
gender race and DSM-III
edit[[I would like a link that goes to the "gender, race, and DSM-III" experiment or something so that i could learn more about this experiment -Abbey-]]
How to use
editI would like to know how to post this question and fix this thread? 189.34.0.158 (talk) 13:40, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- @189.34.0.158: What question? You've asked a question that only mentions itself, and you haven't said what needs fixing. If you have a real question about using Wikipedia, go to the Teahouse. --Thnidu (talk) 16:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
psychnews
editThe URL given for the Mark Moran article in Psychiatric News says
- You have reached this page in error. Please click here to return to the fulltext article.
I've corrected the link accordingly. --Thnidu (talk) 16:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)