This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gibraltar, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gibraltar and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GibraltarWikipedia:WikiProject GibraltarTemplate:WikiProject GibraltarGibraltar articles
This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
A fact from Rosia Bay appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 October 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I will be reverting the last seven edits from 18 September 2012. (I've never reverted an edit before, so hopefully it will go smoothly.) While the contributor surely acted in good faith, the division and rearrangement of the sections and paragraphs has resulted in a series of one and two-sentence paragraphs. The flow of the article has been interrupted. Example: the topics of the Victualling Yard and Rosia Cottages were closely related, yet they were separated in the revised version. Most important was the resultant apparent lack of sourcing. The division and rearrangement resulted in four paragraphs (excluding the lead) which either had no references or terminated in a sentence which was unreferenced. I submitted a DYK nomination for this article the previous day, on 17 September 2012. As the article currently exists, it does not meet DYK standards. However, I do plan on incorporating some of the contributor's suggestions into the article today. Anne (talk) 17:45, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
