Talk:Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Connection to subject
For what it's worth, I have worked a little on this article, and I know the subject; specifically/most significantly, we worked together to plan and run the Wikipedia 15 event in San Francisco, and we are both on the Signpost editorial board. -Pete (talk) 04:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Me too. Heck, everyone knows Rosie. Montanabw(talk) 06:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note censorship of my previous comments about this article by a connected contributor. DracoE 15:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- FYI per a deleted comment, I did not add the links to my blog in this article. I merely corrected the spelling of my name in a link to my blog that another editor added. Funcrunch (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- @DracoEssentialis: I understand some skepticism here (Wikipedia editors editing an article about a Wikipedian), but I don't think eliminating the fact that Stephenson-Goodknight was named a co-Wikipedian of the Year altogether is particularly helpful. Surely the WMF blog verifying this claim is appropriate. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note censorship of my previous comments about this article by a connected contributor. DracoE 15:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Notability and sourcing
A number of sources have been removed by DracoEssentialis, who has also questioned the overall notability of the subject. One important point: a source need not rise to the level of establishing notability to be reliable enough to use in the article. This is, regrettably, something Wikipedia content guidelines don't elaborate very clearly. If there's a notability question, that should be dealt with first, so we can make a determination about whether the article should stay or not; but that point has no bearing on whether (say) a blog post can be used to establish an uncontroversial fact. -Pete (talk) 20:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Off-topic
|
---|
|
Picture without a T-shirt
I think we need to use a picture of Rosie where she is not wearing a T-shirt. After all, she is a minor Serbian nobility.
Here is my proposed photo. Please discuss. Geraldshields11 (talk) 22:13, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Dear @Frank Schulenburg: Please comment on the possible change in the photos. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:57, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
item note
hi all. I guess we will see if we can find a way to add the info about 6,000,000th edit, to this article as well!! I guess we can wait a while, to see if some reliable sources out there give us some good article to use as citations. glad to see this article here. see you!! --Sm8900 (talk) 20:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- this is now done. Done --Sm8900 (talk) 03:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)