Talk:Rosika Schwimmer/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Fiamh in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Fiamh (talk · contribs) 00:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed
  • "signaled the beginning of a smear campaign against [Schwimmer] and the eventual termination of her public career"—I would attribute this quote
  Done SusunW (talk) 07:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Done SusunW (talk) 07:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Done SusunW (talk) 07:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
The carte-de-visite was created by the Atelier Lackner, VIII Lerchenfelderstraße 38, Vienna. I have done multiple searches, but am unable to locate anything at all on this photography studio. However, the original image is held in the archives of Atria and was stolen by the Nazis as part of the International Archives for the Women's Movement. They note they have the original image, it is in the public domain and was taken in 1890. As these records were returned to Amsterdam in 2003, it is very unlikely that the image was published before that time, except as a visiting card. I checked US newspapers and find no images of Schwimmer published before 1914 and none after that date that were derived from this image. I also checked multiple archives for Austria and Hungary and find no publication of this image for Schwimmer, but admittedly not speaking Hungarian or German, I could have missed an archive. That being said, as it is likely it was not published before Atria received the documents back, it is in the PD as having been created more than 120 years ago. SusunW (talk) 07:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
In that case the correct tag is {{PD-US-unpublished}}. I went ahead and added it to the photograph. Fiamh (talk, contribs) 08:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Done SusunW (talk) 07:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply