This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Boxing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoxingWikipedia:WikiProject BoxingTemplate:WikiProject BoxingBoxing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Re this edit: I don't understand what's wrong with the link to Rochester Boxing Hall of Fame. Removing redlinks also removes any ability to determine how popular a potential new article on the topic might be, and where it might best be linked. And I also don't understand why the newspaper article is sufficient citation for all of the other claims in the article, but not for the world ranking. PowersT13:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Replace the redline if you wish but I don't think, based on other hall of fame articles, that Rochester Boxing Hall of Fame will ever be notable enough for an article. Any notability this subject has comes from being ranked fifth in the world. I looked at his boxing record and there were no fights of any note (i.e. championships) so I don't know where the claim comes from. A claim in a local interest piece is not enough but now I see you have found a corroborative claim. That is what I was after.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply