Talk:Rostekhnadzor

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lugnuts in topic Requested move 13 October 2020

Speedy nomination

edit

Can't understand these trigger-happies who placing speedy deletion tag just five minute after creation of the stub. If one of the most import supervisory services of Russia does not serves its own article, you may as well delete 2/3 of Wikipeadia contest. There are lot of sources to establish its notability. Beagel (talk) 09:08, 29 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved per WP:BRD. --BDD (talk) 23:01, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Federal Service of Ecological, Technological and Nuclear Supervision (Russia)Rostekhnadzor – This page was moved from Rostekhnadzor to its current title by the edit summary: official, correct name. However, as the common name is Rostekhnadzor it should be preferred to the official name per WP:TITLE and WP:NCCORP should be preferred. Beagel (talk) 18:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 13 October 2020

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply



RostekhnadzorFederal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear SupervisionБундист moved page Rostekhnadzor to Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision by reason: moving to full name of government agency, as per official English translation at http://en.gosnadzor.gov.ru/. However, as the current name is a result of the RM discussion, the longstanding name was restored and new RM discussion is started. Beagel (talk) 04:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose. No evidence that the current name Rostekhnadzor is not the common name in English, and it seems most unlikely that the proposed translation is in common use. The source cited is primary of course. Andrewa (talk) 16:07, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • I also want to note that, looking at the English language government site - http://en.gosnadzor.gov.ru/ - the shorthand they provide there is "Rostechnadzor," rather than "Rostekhnadzor." What's the right way to adjudicate between these, given multiple translations/transliterations? Бундист (talk) 17:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • Interesting... as I see it we have two decisions to make, one is whether the long or short form is used, and the other is, if we decide on the short form, which spelling to use. I as yet have no opinion on the spelling. But the official name doesn't seem to have anything going for it at all. So no change of !vote. Andrewa (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.