Talk:Rotational angiography

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I propose merging Volume CT into Rotational angiography. Aren't they mighty close to being the same thing? — $Q$ uantling (talk | contribs) 14:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Volume CT and rotational angiography are done on two different pieces of equipment. They do not produce the same images. Rotational angiography may produce images in a similar style because it rotates around the patient but they are used in very different ways. 70.95.98.227 (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge Supporting my own proposal. The Rotational angiography article currently says "Synonyms for rotational angiography include flat-panel volume CT^[1] and cone-beam CT.^[2]"

^ Cite error: The named reference guptarsna was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference hartkens was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

Add topic

[guptarsna-1] Cite error: The named reference guptarsna was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[hartkens-2] Cite error: The named reference hartkens was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]

[2]