Talk:Rotax 915 iS
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Marc Lacoste in topic Proposed merger with Rotax 916 iS
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rotax 915 iS article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed merger with Rotax 916 iS
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Oppose - while it is a derivative of the 915, which itself is a derivative of the Rotax 912, the Rotax 916 iS is a distinctive type, with sufficient notability for a stand-alone article, as already shown by the refs cited. See WP:GNG. The 160 hp power output positions it for a whole new class of aircraft applications, where it will be replacing engines like the Lycoming O-320, as illustrated by its installation in the Carbon Cub UL, so it is expected to see wide uptake. - Ahunt (talk) 12:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Ahunt. BilCat (talk) 19:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Okay then! I saw the 916 as an uprated 915, only with a little more turbocharger boost.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.