 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
References
editHi @Karl432: Regarding your removal of the refimprove tag, when I placed that tag there was only one reference shown, and it was cited only once (in the second sentence of the article text); most of the article was unreferenced. Also, the source in question appears to be a conference paper of some sort, written by a single author, so it's debatable whether it counts as RS. The other external links may or may not support the article contents, but as they are not properly cited this is difficult to verify. Therefore, I don't think the refimprove tag was unjustified, but now that you've removed it I certainly don't intend to go to edit war over this. :) Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:44, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- The information was contained in the "External links". Now, I changed these to "references" included at the appropriate places (dropping one which was redundant). I hope that this is more clear now. -- Karl432 (talk) 14:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)