Talk:Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Rotterdam may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150729000000/http://www.eduniversal-ranking.com/business-school-university-ranking-5palms.html to http://www.eduniversal-ranking.com/business-school-university-ranking-5palms.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Controversies
editIt might make sense to add a controversy page, as there was quite a lot of negative media attention to RSM the last couple years for two reasons: 1. Shell involvement in the curriculum. 2. Research financed by Shell to argue for the removal of dividend tax (source)
Right now the page looks a little bit like an advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.161.51.28 (talk) 01:37, 16 November 2019 (UTC)